Join our newsletter
Get updated info, tips and news about breastfeeding, e-lactancia project and other initiatives from APILAM
Legitimation: Consent of the interested party
As a user and interested I inform you that the data you provide will be located on the servers of MailChimp (email marketing provider of APILAM) outside the EU in the USA. MailChimp is covered by the EU-US Privacy Shield agreement, whose information is available here, approved by the European Committee for Data Protection. See Mailchimp's privacy policy. (https://mailchimp.com/legal/privacy/).
The fact that you do not enter the personal data that appear on the form as mandatory may have the consequence that we can not meet your request.
You can exercise your rights of access, rectification, limitation and delete the data in apilam.es@gmail.com as well as the right to file a claim with a control authority.
You can consult the additional and detailed information on Data Protection on this website: http://e-lactancia.org, as well as consult our own privacy policy.
An analogue of purine nucleoside which inhibits the synthesis and repair of DNA.
It is used in the treatment of leukemia orally or intravenously for 5 days in cycles every 28 days.
Since the last update we have not found any published data on its excretion in breast milk.
Its pharmacokinetic data (low molecular weight, low protein binding and long elimination half-life) makes it possible that it may transfer into breastmilk in amounts that could be significant.
There is considerable variability in the published elimination half-life of this drug from 6.9 to 33.5 hours, possibly influencing the patient's renal function status (Lichtman 2002, Johnson 2000).
It is known from pharmacokinetics that after 3 elimination half-lives (T½), 87.5% of the drug is eliminated from the organism; after 4 T½ it is 94%, after 5 T½, 96.9%, after 6 T½, 98.4% and after 7 T½, 99%. From 7 T½ the plasma concentrations of the drug in the body are negligible. In general, a period of at least five half-lives can be considered a safe waiting period before breastfeeding again (Anderson 2016).
Taking the longest published T½ of all the active metabolites as a reference, these 5 T½ would correspond to 7 days. Due to major side effects, it would be advisable to wait 7 T½, which would correspond to 9 days. Meanwhile, express and discard milk from the breast regularly to maintain production.
When it is possible to do so, milk detections of each patient to determine the total elimination of the drug would be the best indicator to resume breastfeeding between two cycles of chemotherapy.
During the treatment of cancer, breastfeeding should be interrupted temporarily due to potentially serious side effects for the infant. Chemotherapy does not affect milk production during or after treatment.
Abrupt weaning can be psychologically traumatic for both the mother and the infant (Pistilli 2013). If the mother wishes, production of milk can be maintained by regularly expressing breastmilk, being able to resume breastfeeding in the periods in which no significant traces of the drug remain in the milk (Anderson 2016) or at the end of the treatment (Pistilli 2013).
Some chemotherapeutic agents with an antibiotic effect can alter the composition of the microbiota (bacterial set or bacterial flora) of the milk and the concentration of some of its components (Urbaniak 2014). This possibly occurs temporarily with subsequent recovery, although no harmful effects are assumed or have been reported in breastfed infants.
Women undergoing chemotherapy during pregnancy have lower rates of breastfeeding because they experience difficulties in breastfeeding (Stopenski 2017), needing more support to achieve it.
Given the strong evidence that exists regarding the benefits of breastfeeding for the development of babies and the health of mothers, it is advisable to evaluate the risk-benefit of any maternal treatment, including chemotherapy, individually advising each mother who wishes to continue with breastfeeding (Koren 2013).